检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭蕊[1] 邓树嵩[1] 严亚琼[2] 梁建成[1] 蒙仕江[1]
机构地区:[1]右江民族医学院预防医学教研室,百色533000 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系
出 处:《现代预防医学》2009年第11期2078-2079,共2页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:[目的]了解桂西地区壮族中学生一般自我效能感和应对方式之间的关系。[方法]选取桂西地区512名壮族中学生作为受试对象。采用一般自我效能感量表和应对方式量表对中学生进行问卷调查。[结果]一般自我效能与解决问题、求助的积极应对方式呈正相关(r=0.627,P=0.00,r=0.518,P=0.00),与自责、幻想、退避、合理化的应对方式呈负相关(r=-0.421,P=0.00;r=-0.394,P=0.00;r=-0.218,P=0.00;r=-0.173,P=0.00)。一般自我效能感高的学生更多地采取解决问题、求助的应对方式。一般自我效能受到解决问题、自责、求助和退避应对方式的影响。[结论]壮族中学生一般自我效能与应对方式密切相关,不同的应对方式对一般自我效能有一定的影响。[ Objective ] To understand the relationship of self-efficacy and copying style of the Chuang students from middle schools in Guixi. [ Methods] A total of 512 students were surveyed by the general perceived self-efficacy scale and copying style scale. [ Results ] There was signitieant correlation between self-efficacy and copying style. Self-efficacy was related positively with solving problem and seeking support, but negatively with serf-accusation, fantasy, withdrawal and rationalization. And self-efficacy was affected by solving problem, seeking support, self-accusation and withdrawal. [ Conclusion] Different copying style could influence on self-efficaey.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145