检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]德国哈根远程大学 [2]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院
出 处:《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第3期1-10,共10页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
摘 要:欧洲化和一体化是欧盟研究的两个核心概念。近年来越来越多地使用"欧洲化"概念不仅反映了欧洲一体化的发展历程,也反映了这种发展对成员国巨大的反作用。欧洲化既不是新瓶装旧酒,也不是根本的概念创新,而是一个很抽象的概念,它的过程和有关特征还不能作为可操作的概念来研究,大多数研究只是把国家层级的变化作为欧洲一体化的结果。欧洲化概念的使用者在诸多方面对新功能主义进行了修正,更加强调政治运行的复杂性,更加关注欧洲和国家发展之间转化机制的系统研究,强调在变化的机会结构框架中的利益诉求以及传播、学习和社会化进程。Europeanization and European Integration are two central terms in the EU study. This article aims at comparing the two conceptions and analyzing the similarities and differences between them. With the help of case study are the methodology in Europeanization research and its research design to be drawn out. The term Europeanization is very popular in recent years, which reflects not only the process of European Integration itself, but also its huge counterforce on the member states. Europeanization is neither tautology nor completely conceptional creation but a very abstract conception, of which process and feature can yet not be defined as operable terms. While the most researchers still believe the changes on the national level as a consequence driven by European integration, the researchers who use this term have in many ways revising the theory of neo - functionalism, putting more stress on the complexity of function of political system, paying more attention to systematical research on the transformation mechanism between the development of EU and its member states, and emphasizing the interest appeal and the process of learning and socialization in the transformed opportunity structural framework.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28