检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京210016 [2]南京科技创业服务中心,江苏南京210061
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2009年第11期114-118,共5页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:江苏省软科学研究项目(BR2006011);南京航空航天大学哲学社会科学基金项目(V0694-096)
摘 要:绩效评价是科技企业孵化器绩效管理的重点和难点。由于组织使命、组织目标等组织内外因素的特殊性,科技企业孵化器绩效评价比一般营利组织和政府部门绩效评价难度更大。目前我国对科技企业孵化器绩效评价已大致形成共识,绩效评价标准也渐趋成熟,绩效评价方法多属定性描述。但由于我国科技企业孵化器发展历史较短、统计资料欠缺、制度设计不全等因素,绩效评价在理论和实践方面都存在诸多问题。未来我国要在科技企业孵化器绩效评价研究上有所突破,应该做到制度创新、方法集成、内容创新,并加强组织能力建设。Performance evaluation is focal and difficult point of the performance management of S&T business incubator. The performance evaluation of S&T business incubator is much more difficulty than the performance evaluation of profit organization and government departments due to the particularity of organization's mission & goal. The common views on the performance evaluation of S&T business incubator have taken shape in our country, the standards of performance evaluation are riper, most methods of performance evaluation are qualitative. However, there are a lot of problems on performance evaluation in the field of theory and practice because of those factors, such as the short developing history, lack of statistical data and flaws in system design. In the future,the research of performance evaluation of S&T business incubator will make great progress, if innovation of theory and content,integration of methods and improving the ability of management have been done .
分 类 号:F091.354[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3