东亚三种战略模式比较研究——兼论东亚模式转型的必要性  

The Post-Neoliberalism,Post East Asian Model and the Noe-East Asian Model:the Necessity of Transition for East Asian Model

作　　者：王文龙[1] 金丽馥[1] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学商学院

出　　处：《东北亚论坛》2009年第2期61-67,共7页Northeast Asia Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(08BJY040)

摘　　要：虽然后新自由主义、后东亚模式分别受到华盛顿共识、北京共识的追捧与推崇,韩国、中国台湾地区的新东亚模式由于政治转型的阵痛而备受冷落。然而,与后新自由主义导致经济依附性发展不断加深,社会贫富差距不断扩大,后东亚模式导致政府失灵加剧,金权勾结普遍化相比,新东亚模式地区的经济发展与社会发展更为协调,经济发展的可持续性更强。随着后发国家发展环境的改变,新自由主义与东亚模式已经失去其存在的合理性,只有通过积极的战略转型,依靠民主宪政和有限贸易保护政策制约政府失灵,减少市场失灵,后发国家才能够避免经济的过度依附性发展,缩小社会贫富差距,增强发展的可持续性,实现现代化的赶超。Although the post -neoliberalism, respectively, post East Asian model by the Washington Consensus, the Beijing Consensus and highly sought after, South Korea, China Taiwan＇s neo East Asian model of political transition and pains have been ignored. However, the poet neeliberal economic dependence deepening the development of social disparities between rich and poor, the post East Asian model led to the failure of the government intensified, the universal right of collusion, the new East Asian model of economic development and social development more Coerdinatiot~ of economic development more sustainable. With the late change in the environment for the development of the country, East Asia and the neoliberal model has lost its rationality, it is only through a positive tranaition strategy, relying on the democratic and constitutional constraints limited trade protection policy failure of the Government to reduce market failures, followed by countries will be able to avoid over - dependence of economic de- velopment and narrow the social gap between rich and poor, and enhance the sustainability of development, modernization of catch - up.

关 键 词：依附性发展 政府失灵 社会资本 民主宪政 有限贸易保护 

分 类 号：F019[经济管理—政治经济学]