检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵昱[1]
机构地区:[1]民航总医院,北京100123
出 处:《民航医学》2009年第2期8-10,共3页
摘 要:目的比较开郁清热法和传统中医治疗消渴方法滋阴清热法在2型糖尿病临床治疗中的降糖疗效。方法采用对照开放式研究,将280例2型糖尿病患者辨证分为2组,治疗组开郁清热组160例,对照组六味地黄组120例,观察周期为12周,观察指标为空腹和餐后2h血糖。结果开郁清热组降糖有效率为85%,六味地黄组降糖有效率为45%,两组比较,有显著性差异(P〈0.01)。结论治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。Objective To investigate the different effects of decreasing blood glucose in the patients with type 2 diabetes treated with 2 methods - Kaiyuqinre and Ziyinqingre. Metheds 280 subjects were divided into 2 groups: Kaiyuqingre group with 160 subjects vs Liuweidihuang group with 120 subjects. The study was designed as long as 12 weeks with FBG and P2hBG as the indices of treatment effects. Results the effective rate of reducing blood glucose: 85~ in Kaiyuqingre group vs 45% in Ziyingqingre group, and the statistical analysis indicated the significant differences between 2 groups (P〈0.01). Conclusion Kaiyuqingre method showed an advantage over the traditional Ziyinqingre method in the treatment of T2DM.
分 类 号:R259.871[医药卫生—中西医结合] R587.1[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117