刑法第306条设置批判质疑  

The Criticism and Questioning of Clause 306 of the Criminal Law

作　　者：毛元学[1] 杨晓琪[2] 

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025 [2]中共贵阳市委政法委员会,贵州贵阳550001

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期44-46,共3页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：我国《刑法》在1997年修改之后,其第306条一直在法律界备受关注,该条规定从立法观念、特殊主体设置、条文拟制、司法平衡、审判实践及实施后果上都引起极大争议,尤其是律师界对此条规定意见颇多。在宪政背景下,公权机关仍然是公众权利的受托人或者代言人,对公权机关的无原则歧视或者攻击,就是对公民权利的另一种不尊重或者践踏。因为公权机关同样需要善待,一如公民权利需要善待一样。In recent years, Clause 306 of the Criminal Law has been concerned about after the revision of the Law in 1997. It becomes controversial because of legislative concept, setting of the special subject, formulation of the clauses, justice balance, trial practice and consequences of implementing, especially judgments of lawyers. Under the background of constitution, the public power organs are still the trustees or spokesmen of the public rights. Anti -principles＇discrimination or attack to the public power organs is another irreverence to the civil right, because the civil power organs, as well as public rights, need to be treated kindly.

关 键 词：刑法第306条 刑事辩护豁免权 刑事诉讼 辩护人 诉讼代理人 司法机关 

分 类 号：D924.04[政治法律—刑法学]