检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈光献[1] 吴钟凯[1] 唐白云[1] 刘海[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院心脏外科,广州510080
出 处:《中华生物医学工程杂志》2008年第6期413-416,共4页Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基 金:国家杰出青年科学基金(30525020);教育部博士点基金(20050558050);人事部留学人员项目(粤人发2006-11);广东省省科技厅国际合作项目(20078050200024);广东省卫生厅基金资助项目(B2007038,A2008173)
摘 要:目的研究静脉与左心室两种不同给药途径的腺苷预处理对在体缺血再灌注心肌的保护作用。方法48只成年SD大鼠随机分6组(n=8),分别为缺血再灌注组、缺血预处理组、腺苷静脉组、腺苷左心室组、生理盐水静脉组、生理盐水左心室组。建立大鼠在体缺血再灌注损伤模型,观察各组缺血再灌注前后心功能变化,并检测再灌注末血清肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)、丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)的变化以及心肌组织核转录因子KB(NF—κB)的表达。结果缺血预处理组、腺苷静脉组及腺苷左心室组SOD值[(208.63±23.88)、(178.27±11.56)、(191.31±28.14)U/ml]均高于缺血再灌注组[(145.05±23.18)U/ml,P〈0.05];cTnT、MDA值、NF—KB的表达均低于缺血再灌注组(P〈0.05);心功能均好于缺血再灌注组。腺苷左心室组SOD值高于腺苷静脉组(P〈0.05);cTnT、MDA值、NF—κB的表达低于腺苷静脉组(P〈0.05)。结论腺苷预处理可以模拟缺血预处理的心肌保护作用。左心室给药的腺苷预处理的心肌保护作用优于静脉给药的腺苷预处理的心肌保护作用。Objective To evaluate the effect on myocardial protection of adenosine preconditioning in different route of administration through fight jugular vein and left ventricle. Methods Forty-eight SD rats were randomly divided into ischemia reperfusion group (blank control), isehemic preconditioning group (IP, positive control), adenosine venous infusion group, adenosine ventricular group, normal saline (NS) venous infusion group (negative control I) and NS ventricular group (negative control II). The ischemia reperfusion rat models were established in vivo, and then changes of heart function, serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) and expression of nuclear factor- κB (NF- κB) were observed. Results SOD in IP [(208.63±23.88) U/roll ,adenosine venous infusion group[(178.27±11.56) U/ml] and adenosine ventricular group [(191.31 ±28.14) U/ml] were significantly higher than that in the ischemia reperfusion group [(145.05±23.18) U/ml] (P〈0.05), cTnT, MDA and expression of NF-KB were lower than those in the ischemia reperfusion group (P〈0.05). Heart function was significantly better than that in the ischemia reperfusion group (P〈0.05) ; SOD in adenosine ventricular group was significantly higher than that in adenosine venous infusion group (P〈0.05). cTnT, MDA and expression of NF-κB were lower than those in adenosine venous infusion group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Adenosine preconditioning may mimic protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. The effect on myocardial protection of adenosine in ventricular group is better than that of adenosine venous infusion group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.45