关于五四运动研究的三个问题——从国共两党纪念五四运动谈起  

Three Issues Concerning the May 4^(th) Movement Research——Thoughts on the Commemoration of the May 4th Movement by KMT and CPC

作　　者：董德福[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏大学人文社会科学学院,江苏镇江212013

出　　处：《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期24-28,共5页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：江苏省哲学社会科学基金项目(07LSB001)

摘　　要：90年来,关于五四运动的研究成果可谓汗牛充栋,但一些问题仍有进一步探讨的必要,例如五四运动领导权问题、五四诠释模式问题、五四价值的时代性问题等。五四运动是多种力量共同推动的结果,不是共产党或国民党或以梁启超为首的研究系所单独发动和领导的。五四诠释中的激进主义、保守主义和自由主义话语系统之间应打破霸权之争,实现良性互动,构建开放式的多元的五四话语系统。研究历史是为现实服务的,在不同时代的不同研究者那里,五四运动具有非常不同的内涵和意义,五四研究和五四价值被赋予了个性特征和时代特征,这是正当的,但应给予必要的限制,其底线是不能有悖于历史真实。The ninety years has produced numerous academic results in the research of the May 4th Movement in 1919, but some issues still remain to be further clarified, for example, the leadership of the May 4^th Movement, the interpretive model of the May 4^th Movement, the epoch-making nature of its value, etc. The Movement resulted not solely from the initiative and leadership of CPC or KMT or researchers led by Liang Qichao, but from the joint efforts of many forces. Such discourse systems as radicalism, conservatism, and literalism in interpreting the Movement should break through hegemony, interact with each other and construct an open and multi-plural discourse system of the Movement. Historical studies is to serve reality, so to different scholars at different times, the Movement has very different connotation and significance. The research on the May 4^th Movement and the May 4^th value is endowed with individual characteristics and that of the researchers＇ living age. That is justifiable, but necessary restraint is also essential. The bottom line is not to betray the actual history.

关 键 词：五四运动 领导权 五四诠释 时代性 

分 类 号：I261.1[文学—中国文学]