肾碎裂伤两种修复方法疗效比较研究  

Comparative Study on Effects of Two Repairing Methods on Kidney Rupture in Dogs

作　　者：赵新求[1] 严培荣[1] 王鹏 韩利 华川 陈宇东 李培建 张继友 解放军第二五二医院泌尿外科 

机构地区：[1]解放军第三O四医院泌尿外科

出　　处：《中华创伤杂志》1998年第3期163-165,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma

摘　　要：目的观察肾碎裂伤后两种修补方法的疗效。方法采用１８只杂交犬随机分为大网膜组、人羊膜组、肠线组（对照组），左侧肾脏以石膏牵开器致肾碎裂伤。结果大网膜组术前，术后２、６个月血压、肾素活性、肾脏体积与人羊膜组、肠线组比较有明显差异（Ｐ＜０．０１）。Aim To study the effects of two repairing methods on unilateral kidney rupture. Methods Eighteen mongrel dogs were made renal rupture by a case spreader and were divided randomly into three groups: one repaired with omentum majus (group A), one with fresh human amnion (group B), and one with catgut (the control group). Result The blood pressure, the renin activity and the renal parenchyma of preoperation, three months and six months postoperation in group A were significantly different from those in the other two groups. Conclusion Omentum majus is the most effective material to repair renal rupture.

关 键 词：肾损伤 碎裂伤 修复 比较研究 

分 类 号：R692.05[医药卫生—泌尿科学]