检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国民康医学》2009年第11期1216-1217,1220,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:比较舍曲林与阿米替林治疗创伤后应激障碍的疗效和不良反应。方法:81例创伤后应激障碍患者随机分成两组,分别用舍曲林与阿米替林治疗12周。用症状自评量表(SCL-90)中的躯体化、抑郁和焦虑3个因子总分评定症状变化,用不同减分率评定疗效。用不良反应量表(TESS)评定药物不良反应。结果:舍曲林组痊愈率为61.90%,总有效率为90.48%;阿米替林的痊愈率为43.59%,总有效率为71.79%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组TESS测评,各时点组间比较,差异有统计学或高度统计学意义(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。结论:舍曲林治疗创伤后应激障碍疗效确切,不良反应较小。Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects and adverse drug reactions between Sertraline and Amitriptyline in the treatment of somatization disorder. Methods: Eighty - one patients with posttraumatic stress disorder were randomized into 2 groups ,which were treated with Sertraline or Amitriptyline for 12 week. The symptomatic changes were evaluated using the total score of somatization ,depression, and anxiety as described in symptom check - list 90 ( SCL -90 ), the therapeutic effect was assessed using various subtraction rates. And drug - related adverse drug reactions were evaluated using the treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS). Results : The recovery rate was 61.90% in the Sertraline treatment group and 43.59% in the Amitriptyline treatment group, and the total effective rate was 90.48% and 71.79% respectively. The difference in the efficacy between 2 groups was significant (P 〈 0.05 ). TESS tests revealed that there were significant differences between 2 groups at various time points. Conclusions: Sertraline is effective in the treatment of posttranmatic stress disorder,but has few adverse drug reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15