检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐聪颖[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031 [2]江西财经大学法学院
出 处:《特区经济》2009年第5期246-248,共3页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:商标窃权是近年来在我国新出现的一类商标侵权案件,但在现行商标法中,法律却并未对由此引发的权属纠纷作出规定。本文认为,传统民法中的善意取得制度不适用于解决商标窃权案件中的权属纠纷。但从充分维护消费者利益的角度出发,法律在承认商标失权人有权追回商标权的同时,还应允许善意受让人在特定条件下对商标的继续使用。The theft of trademark right is a new category of trademark torts in our country,but there is no regulation in trademark law to resolve the dispute between the sufferer and the third party who has obtained the right from the thief.This article holds that the institution of acquisition in good faith of civil law can not be applied to resolve the controversy.To protect the consumer’s interest,trademark law should acknowledge the sufferer can recover his right,but at the same time,the law should allow the the third party who acquire the trademark right in good faith has the right to use the trademark continuously in the specific conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188