不同方法治疗阴道炎临床效果对比研究  

Studies on efficacy of different methods in treating vaginitis

作　　者：王昕[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津医科大学研究生院,天津300070

出　　处：《天津医科大学学报》2009年第2期201-203,共3页Journal of Tianjin Medical University

摘　　要：目的:比较不同方法治疗阴道炎的临床效果,为进一步改进阴道炎的治疗方法提供依据。方法:采用随机开放平行对照研究,将176例患有细菌性阴道病(BV)、外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病(VVC)的妇女随机分为4组,分别为单纯药物治疗组、药物配伍臭氧治疗组、药物配伍硼酸治疗组和单纯臭氧治疗组。通过观察患者症状,体征及实验室检查等方面的变化来判定治疗效果。结果:4种治疗方法对治疗VVC、BV效果相当,且药物配伍臭氧治疗组疗效优于其他3组。结论:臭氧液治疗阴道炎是一种安全、有效、广谱,不易产生耐药,易于为患者接受的治疗方法,且臭氧配伍药物治疗效果更佳,值得在基层推广。Objective： To compare the clinical therapy effect of various methods in vaginitis. Methods： 176 women with bacteria vaginosis（BV） and vulvovaginai candidiasis（VVC）were analysed by the method of random-open-parallel-controlled study.The objects were divided into four groups： medicine therapy group, medicine combined with ozone therapy group, medicine combined with boracic acid therapy group and pure ozone therapy group.Symptoms ,signs,examination of laboratory were observed to determine the effect. Resuits： Four kinds of therapy were effective in treatment of two kinds of vaginitis , but the effect of medicine combined with ozone group was better than that of other groups. Conclusion： Ozone liquid is safe ,effective and may be accepted easily by patients with vaginitis.

关 键 词：臭氧液 细菌性阴道病 外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病 

分 类 号：R711.31[医药卫生—妇产科学]