科学与宗教:自然、社会与实践  

Science and Religion:Nature,Society and Practice

作　　者：邢冬梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学哲学系,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2009年第5期87-91,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助课题"实践视野中科学与人文的交融研究"(05BZX024)

摘　　要：在科学与宗教的关系上,科学实在论与社会建构论持两种极端的态度。科学实在论认为科学与宗教是人类活动的两种完全不同的领域,科学研究自然,而宗教则管辖着人类的精神与道德生活,两者毫无相关性。社会建构论认为,如果自然科学是科学家共同体的范式,那么创世科学则是圣经基要主义者宗派的范式,两者之间尽管不可通约,但具有同等的地位与权利。据此导致了两者的激烈的冲突。关键问题在于双方脱离了人类的生活经验去谈论科学与宗教的关系。怀特海哲学表现了他试图在人类生活经验中用动态来综合静态,把价值输入事实,用潜能来组合现实,用宗教来调和科学,从事件走向实有再到机体的基本思想趋势,所有这一切,目的在于消除由自然的二岔性所导致的科学危机。On the relationship between science and religion, scientific realism holds the opposite attitude with social eonstructivism . To scientific real- ism, science and religion belong to totally different field that the former focuses on material nature world and the later focuses on human＇ s spirit and moral life. To social construetivism, if we accept that nature science is the paradigm for scientific community, then we must accept science of creation is the par- adigm for Babble foundationism community, and tow paradigms are incommensurable but have the equal position and right in human world. The difference rouses the strong conflict and long time misapprehend to ideas of science as practice and process philosophy , the conflict rooted that both opposite sides all are out of the real human-life experience to talk about science and religion and the relationship between them . To put the value into fact, combine the potential with reality, adjust science with religion is the road to dissolve the conflict and save science from the crisis roused by the dichotomy of subject and object.

关 键 词：科学 宗教 自然 社会 实践 科学与宗教冲突的解决 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]