检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北武汉430070 [2]武汉市城市建设投资开发集团有限公司,湖北武汉430050
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第6期108-111,共4页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:武汉市建设科研项目(200619)
摘 要:提出了桥梁生命周期环境影响评价和对比分析方法,对于不同桥梁的环境影响评价结果采用单位桥长法和单位原材料法进行修正,并应用于武汉市墨水湖大桥和南太子湖大桥.结果表明,在建筑材料生产过程和桥梁施工过程中固体废弃物环境影响最大,在桥梁运营维护过程中全球变暖环境影响显著,南太子湖大桥施工方法较墨水湖大桥更为环保.A life cycle assessment (LCA) framework was developed to evaluate bridge environment impact of bridges. The synthesized environment impact was analyzed in terms of environmental pollution. The Southern Taizi Lake bridge and Moshui Lake bridge in Wuhan were analyzed and compared by introducing unit length method and unit material method. The results show that solid castoff take up the most environment impact in courses of raw materials' process and construction, and global warming evidently caused the environment impact during the stage of operation, the construction method of Southern Taizi Lake bridge is better to environment than that of Moshui Lake bridge.
关 键 词:桥梁建设 生命周期评价 物化环境影响 固体废弃物 对比分析
分 类 号:U448.1[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.186