检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二医院心血管内科,湖南长沙410011
出 处:《心血管病学进展》2009年第3期383-385,共3页Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases
基 金:国家"十五"科技攻关项目(No:2004BA714B03)
摘 要:早期埋藏式心脏复律除颤器装置可靠性差,除颤失败率高,对快速的室性心律失常(室性心动过速)或心室颤动事件唯一的治疗方法是电击;因此在植入埋藏式心脏复律除颤器时常规进行除颤阈值测试。现代埋藏式心脏复律除颤器的性能较前明显改善,除颤性能提高,经静脉途径植入埋藏式心脏复律除颤器的平均除颤阈值是20~30J,低于埋藏式心脏复律除颤器最大输出能量,且除颤阈值测试可给患者带来一定的危险;因此许多临床心脏电生理学者开始质疑埋藏式心脏复律除颤器植入术中除颤阈值测试的价值。Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has traditionally been a routine part of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ( ICD ) implantation. In the early days of ICD, devices were much less reliable and failure of defibrillation was common. Today, many features of the ICD have evolved which have greatly improved the efficacy of defibrillation. The mean DFT of modern transvenous ICDs is now 20 - 30 J lower than the maximum output of modern ICDs. Unfortunately, DFT testing poses some risk to the patient. Therefore, many electrophysiologists have begun to question whether DFT testing is still valuable.
关 键 词:埋藏式心脏复律除颤器 除颤阈值测试
分 类 号:R541.7[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.218.86