检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第3期82-86,101,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
基 金:上海市社科规划青年课题项目(编号:2006EZH002)
摘 要:专利权具有一定的扩张性,专利法因此构建了复杂而系统的权利限制制度,而"试验性使用"豁免原则是这一制度设计的一个重要环节。在德国立法领域,"试验性使用"豁免原则主要表现为法律用语与行为方式较为模糊,试验对象范围较为狭窄和试验目的具有多样性;在德国司法领域,该原则主要表现为法律适用统一,注重社会公益性考量和对法条进行宽松解释并加以运用。Patent right is likely to expand itself, so the patent system introduces a series of complex provisions of restriction on the patent right. The principle of "experimental use" exemption is the highlight of the whole system. This article presents an in-depth analysis of the principle from the aspects of legislation and the history of judicial practice in Germany. In the process of legislation, the performance of the principle is ineffective and inefficient because of ambiguity and uncertainty of related legal provisions and interpretations, narrower scope of test objectives and diversity of the purposes of testing. Conversely, in the field of judicial practice, courts apply this principle more unifiedly and liberally, and pay more attention to the public interest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229