检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《光明中医》2009年第6期1095-1096,共2页GUANGMING JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
摘 要:目的:比较炎症点针刺法与常规阿是穴针刺法对软组织无菌性炎症的疗效差异,分析炎症点针刺法的特点和优势。方法:将200例软组织无菌性炎症患者按先后顺序编号,随机分为两组,单号为炎症点针刺组,双号为常规阿是穴针刺组,观察两组治疗效果。结果:炎症点针刺组有效率98%,常规阿是穴针刺组有效率88%,经统计学处理,χ2=5.83,P<0.05,两组治疗有显著性差异。结论:炎症点针刺法优于常规阿是穴针刺法,该法有明确的刺激点,明确的针刺深度,便于临床规范操作。Objective: To compare curative effects of the method of acupuncture the point of inflamation and the method of acupuncture the point of "A shi" on non-bacterium inflamation of soft tissue. Methods: Two hundreds ease of non-bacterium inflamation of Soft tissue were randomly divided into the group of acupuncture the point of inflamation and the group of acupnctre the the point of "A shi". Observate: The curative effects. Results: The effective rate of 98% in the group of acupuncture the point of inflammation and 88% in the group of acupuncture the point of "A shi"χ^2 = 5.83, P 〈 0.05 ,There are significant difference between the two groups case. Conclusion: The method of acupuncture the point of inflamation is better than the method of acupuncture the point of "A shi".
关 键 词:炎症点针刺法 软组织无菌性炎症 临床分析 治疗方法
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3