检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林剑波[1] 戴兴春[1,2] 黄民生[1] 朱勇[1] 赵丰[1]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学资源与环境科学学院,上海200062 [2]江苏省仪征市水务局,江苏扬州211400
出 处:《水处理技术》2009年第6期92-94,98,共4页Technology of Water Treatment
基 金:上海市建委2007年重大科技攻关项目(建科2007007)
摘 要:采用人工配制的低C/N废水对常规A2/O系统和强化ANAMMOX系统进行冲击试验,确定其冲击耐受极限,并比较采用ANAMMOX技术的优劣。结果表明,低C/N废水对A2/O系统的脱氮功能有明显的抑制作用,C/N=3.5可有效降低系统的硝化功能,C/N=1.2可使反硝化功能完全停止;而采用ANAMMOX反应的A2/O系统对低C/N废水冲击下的脱氮能力有一定的提高,同比条件下,NH4+-N去除率提高约9%,TN去除率提高约5%;但ANAMMOX反应对系统反硝化功能、COD和TP去除功能的作用不明显,同比条件下,两套系统的去除率差异不显著。The shocking experiment as to ANAMMOX system and normal system was conducted by using artificial preparation of the low C/N ratio of wastewater. The shocking tolerance limit was determinined, and the merits of ANAMMOX technology was compared. The results showed that, low C/N wastewater has obvious inhibition to the A^2/O system for nitrogen removal. The C/N ratio of 3.5 could reduce the ftmction of nitrification effectively and C/N ratio of 1.2 could stop the function of denitrification completely. However, the nitrogen removal of the A^2/O system which use ANAMMOX get some improvement in treating low C/N wastewater under the same conditions. The average NH4^+ -N removal was increased to 9% and TN removal was increased to about 5%, while ANAMMOX is ineffective in denitrification and the removal of COD and TP. Under the same conditions, the removal of the two systems has no notable differences.
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249