再论转轨经济法学:一个务虚的伪命题——对《时代法学》2009年第1期相关观点的回应  

On the Transitional Economic Law Again:A Fictitious Pseudo-Proposition

作　　者：李昌庚[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京晓庄学院经济法政学院 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《时代法学》2009年第3期9-16,共8页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：中国经济法的困境不是因为我们使用了西方范式的经济法理论,而是市场经济不成熟及其体制性障碍。如果没有认识到问题的实质,无论如何变换经济法概念,只能形成诸多务虚的伪命题。真正把握中国经济法困境的学者应当建立在充分认识现实国情背后体制性障碍的前提下,发挥经济法的前瞻性功能和预防性功能,构建经济法具体制度,做经济法力所能及的事情,并以此推动政治、经济体制改革的进一步深化,协助突破经济法困境背后的体制性障碍。如果经济法越位思考,将使经济法变得"四不像",最终将肢解经济法,并给反对经济法是独立部门法的人提供了强有力的藉口。The plight of China＇s Economic Law is not because we use the Economic Law theory of Western paradigm, but an immature market economy and its institutional obstacles. If we don＇t realize the substance of the issue, we should have lots of the Fictitious pseudo-proposition, in any case the transformation of Economic Law＇ concept. Scholars who grasp the plight of China＇s Economic Law truly should understand the institutional obstacles behind the actual situation fully, play the forward-looking function and preventive function of Economic Law, build specific systems of Economic Law, do things which Economic Law can do, in order to deepen further political and economic structural reforms, and to help to break through the institutional obstacles behind the plight of Economic Law. ff Economic Law thinks offside, it will become ＂neither fish nor fowl＂, and be dismembered eventually, which will provide a strong excuse for some people who oppose Economic Law to be an independent branch law.

关 键 词：经济法 转轨经济法学 伪命题 误读 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]