检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李智婷[1] 鲍群梅[1] 程建萍[1] 林秋华[1] 黄春霞[1] 马洁茹[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省肇庆市第一人民医院,广东肇庆526020
出 处:《中国医药导报》2009年第18期106-107,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:无肝素血液透析结束时选择适宜的回血方法,可减少凝血并发症、减轻患者经济负担。方法:2008年4~12月对100例行无肝素血液透析治疗患者分别采用连续回血法(50例)、间断回血法(50例),对两种回血法血液透析结束后透析器和透析管道凝血程度进行比较。结果:连续回血法血液透析结束后透析器和透析管道凝血明显减少。结论:连续回血法是具有操作简单方便、凝血并发症少、减轻患者经济负担的有效回血方法。Objective: To choose a suitable way of blood returning after the heparin-free hemodialysis in order to reduce the clotting complications, and to alleviate the financial burden of patients. Methods: From April to December 2008, 100 patients treated with heparin-free hemodialysis were divided into two groups, continuous blood returning method was used in one group(50 cases), while intermittent blood returning method was used in the other group(50 cases). To compare the ex- tent of pipeline clotting after blood returning of these two methods. Results: The pipeline clotting decreased significantly in continuous blood returning method. Conclusion: Continuous blood returning is a simple, convenient method, and has less clotting complications, it can reduce the financial burden of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222