检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州省社会科学院农村发展研究所,贵阳550002 [2]贵州省社会科学院《贵州社会科学》编辑部,贵阳550002
出 处:《林业经济问题》2009年第2期168-172,共5页Issues of Forestry Economics
摘 要:以一个苗族村寨为例,考察分析解放以来农村土地制度几经变迁后的民族地区山林管理的模式及影响因素。研究结果表明:在农村土地集体所有的前提下,社区选择了多种山林管理模式,这些模式除了受国家政策影响外,很大程度上还受到民族社区的传统观念、风俗习惯及经营管理方式的影响;目前一些尚未划分到户、仍由村组统一经营管理的矛盾多、管理难的"公山"的存在,有其历史原因,也有现实必要。重视这些对于推进集体林权制度改革,制定科学适宜的林地政策,保护林地资源,促进生态平衡及增加林农收入。Taking Fanpai, a Miao village in Southeast Guizhou Province as an example, this paper reviews and analyzes the forest management modes and their related factors in ethnic communities where the rural land system has changed again and again since the Liberation. Under the premise of collective ownership, the community has chosen a variety of forest management models. In addition to government policies, the traditional cultures, traditional forest land ownership system, traditional function of the forests, and traditional forest management mechanisms have significant impacts on the forest management modes. The existence of the troublesome "public mountains" still under the public ownership and management by the collective is not only a historical result but also necessary in reality. It is very important to pay attention to all above in promoting the collective forest ownership system reform, and constituting suitable and scientific forest policies to protect forest resources, promote ecological balance, and increase forestry income.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175