英美不同霸权体系下的债权国地位  

On the Different Positions of Creditor Country under Different Hegemonic Systems of Great Britain and the United States

作　　者：王珏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学经济学院,北京100872

出　　处：《教学与研究》2009年第6期56-62,共7页Teaching and Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"大国崛起的经济学分析范式--19世纪中期到20世纪中期的国际经济秩序重构"(项目编号:07AJL004)的阶段性成果;中国人民大学"985"工程"中国经济研究哲学社会科学创新基地"的支持

摘　　要：债权和债务关系是国家博弈和互动的工具和筹码,在英国霸权体系和美国霸权体系中发挥不同的作用。债权是维持英国霸权体系的工具,同时也是发生霸权更迭时的重要筹码,债权国是英国霸权体系的挑战者。而债权却不是美国霸权的体现,债务才是美国维持霸权的工具,美国体系中的债权国会被迫帮助美国维持霸权。一个国家是债权国还是债务国并不是判定这个国家在国际体系中地位的标准,不能够由美国在英国霸权体系下成功称霸的历史来预测和暗示当今美国霸权体系下债权国的未来和霸权更迭模式。Claims and debt is a means of contending and interaction among countries. This relation functions differently under the British hegemonic system and the American hegemonic system. The claims function as a means to maintain the British hegemonic system, and represent a move at the time of hegemony shift. In this way, the creditor country is a challenger of the British hegemonic system. Under the American hegemonic system, however, the claims do not reflect the American hegemony. It is the debt that functions to maintain the American hegemony, and the creditor country has to help the US to maintain its hegemonic position. Therefore, whether a country is the creditor or the debtor does not indicate the position that country holds in the international system. The author concludes that one should not refer to the history of the A- merican success under the British hegemonic system to predict the future of the creditors under the American hegemonic system, or suggest the changing mode of hegemony today.

关 键 词：债权国 霸权体系 国际收支 

分 类 号：F811.5[经济管理—财政学]