检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张健[1] 廖胡[1] 梁钦锋[1] 周志杰[1] 于广锁[1]
机构地区:[1]华东理工大学煤气化教育部重点实验室,上海200237
出 处:《现代化工》2009年第6期77-82,共6页Modern Chemical Industry
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2004CB217703);上海市曙光计划(06SG34);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-06-0416)
摘 要:碳税和碳排放权交易是目前各国主要采用的温室气体减排的政策和机制,但是无论是碳税的征收还是碳排放权交易机制的实行,对经济发展速度和结构平衡都会产生很大影响。因此制定CO2减排政策和指标时,切实考虑国情是十分必要的。本文应用可计算一般均衡模型(CGE)和Cheng F.Lee提出的计算模型研究碳税与碳排放权交易机制对中国各行业的综合影响。结果表明,合理的碳交易机制可以在一定程度上缓解间接碳税对中国能源行业的影响,并且溯往原则作为碳排放权配额分配方式更符合中国的经济现状。The carbon tax and carbon emission trading have been frequently advocated as a cost-effective economic tool. Both carbon tax and emission trading have great effect on the economic development and balance of its configuration. Since China's economics has a high development rate and unbalanced configuration, it is necessary to estimate the economic situation before the emission reduction policy adopted. This study aim to analyze the impacts of carbon tax and emission trading combined on different industrial ectors in China, using Computable General Equilibrium Model and Cheng F. Lee's model. The results indicate that feasible emission trade system can release the energy sector's loss caused by carbon tax, and that the “grandfathering rule” is a more feasible approach in allocating the emission permit to each of China's industrial sectors.
分 类 号:X5[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.160.250