批评话语学派的话语观及其启示  

Critical Discourse Analysts’ Conception of Discourse and Its Implications

作　　者：纪玉华[1] 吴建平[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2009年第7期1-4,共4页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“英美领导人在跨文化交际语境中的英文演讲之批评话语分析”(项目编号:08BYY072);福建省社科规划项目“英汉文化语义对比研究”(项目编号:2008B2083)的成果之一

摘　　要：不同学术领域的研究者从诸多角度给“话语”下定义。本文将这些定义加以评析和归类，认为“话语”至少可以从四个角度来界定，即：结构／语法角度、功能／语义学角度、社会语言学／语用学角度和社会政治／意识形态角度。其中，批评话语学派从社会政治／意识形态角度对“话语”的界定是本文讨论的重点。该话语观对我国话语分析和语言研究工作有重要的借鉴价值和理论指导意义，同时也对当代中国话语分析研究中正在萌发的文化转向有深刻的启发意义和促进作用。The term ＂discourse＂ has been defined in a broad number of ways by researchers in different academic spheres. This study analyses and classifies their definitions and argues that the concept of ＂discourse＂ can be defined from at least four different perspectives, i. e. structural/grammatical, functional/semantic, socio-linguistic/pragmatic,and sociopolitical/ideological. Following a brief review of the first three perspectives, this paper provides a detailed discussion of the definitions proposed by critical discourse analysts from the sociopoliticaL/ideological perspective. This perspective of discourse has not only important theoretical implications for theorists and practitioners in discourse analysis and language study in China,but also inspirations for and contributions to the cultural turn that is burgeoning in the field of contemporary Chinese discourse analysis.

关 键 词：批评话语分析家 话语观 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]