检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐双娥[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南大学法学院,长沙410082
出 处:《生态经济》2009年第7期190-193,共4页Ecological Economy
摘 要:法学上的生态用地不宜采纳生态中心的观点,是指为了保障生态安全、维护人类生存和发展所需的生态功能重要的土地。现代法学上的土地不包括水资源在内,决定了法学上生态用地宜作为国土范畴,才能将生态功能重要的陆地水域纳入其内。耕地的生态条件虽好,但因其实现粮食安全的立法目的决定了不宜纳入生态用地。以实现"粮食换生态"目的的生态退耕地,因不宜作为耕地决定了应为生态用地。只有那些历史上形成的生态条件恶化、只能保存其现状的未利用土地,才可纳入生态用地的范围。It is not very proper to adopt the eco-center definition of ecological land in law. Ecological land can be defined as that land that can guarantee ecological safety and maintain the important ecological functions for human's survival and development. Water resource is excluded from land in modem law, so, the term of ecological land just belongs to the term of land & resources. Otherwise, that land covered by water can't be considered as ecological land in modern society. Although the ecological conditions of arable land are good, its legislative purpose, to achieve food security, fundamentally makes it different from ecological land. Ecological abandoned land should not be considered as arable land decided on its ecological sites. Only those unused lands which formed in the history for their deterioration of ecological conditions can be incorporated into the scope of ecological land in order to preserve their status quo.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38