检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院急诊科,150001
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(中旬版)》2009年第6期42-44,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的调查急诊外伤患者急性期情感抑郁的现状以及所采用的应对方式,分析不同的应对方式与情感抑郁的相关性。方法以问卷调查的方式调查118例急诊外伤急性期患者。情感抑郁用医院焦虑抑郁量表进行评估,应对用医学应对量表进行测评。对调查采集的数据进行描述性分析、独立样本t检验和多元线性回归分析。结果急诊外伤急性期有50.000%的患者发生情感抑郁,其中单纯表现为焦虑症状22例占22.40%,单纯表现为抑郁症状17例占17.30%,表现为焦虑和抑郁2种症状10例占10.20%。发生情感抑郁的患者更常采用屈服的应对方式面对和回避在未发生抑郁患者中被经常采用。结论情感抑郁在急诊外伤患者中发生率高,有多种因素与患者的情感反应有相关性。Objective To investigate the emotional distress and coping style during acute stage in patients following acute traumatic injury, and the relationship in different coping patterns and emotional distress. Methods A total of 118 patients with acute traumatic injury were included in our investigation. Emotional distress was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Coping style was measured with the Medical Modes Questionnaire. Descriptive analysis, independent samples t test and multiple hnear regression analysis were used. Results Emotional distress occurred in 50.00% of the patients with acute traumatic injury,22.40% patients only presented anxiety, 17.30% patients only presented depression, and 10.20% patients presented both anxiety and depression. Yielding and avoidance coping styles were more frequently used in patients with depression. Conclusions Incidence of emotional distress was highly frequently, many factors were associated with patients' affection reaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.89