物权法视野下的征收  

Takings from the Perspective of the Property Law

作　　者：傅强[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100086

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第7期122-129,共8页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：我国目前关于征收的讨论主要是从宪法层面展开的,并且集中在公共利益、征收程序和公正补偿几个方面。在物权法视野下,比较物权法征收条款同宪法规定在内容和效力上的差别,区分其与行政法规定在内涵和程序上的分野,论证物权法征收条款在法律体系中的独立地位。围绕物权法征收条款同相近制度的区别,比较分析德国、法国和美国的征收实践,提出并探讨"对财产权何种程度的干涉构成征收"这一前提性问题。最后,针对近来争论比较激烈的机动车限行问题,进行理论上的分类,并澄清其中一些模糊的前提。Currently, discussions about takings mainly proceed from the perspective of constitution, and focus especially on such aspects as public interest, condemnation procedure and fair compensation. However, from the perspective of the property law, this article compares the difference as to the content and effectiveness between takings clause of the property law and its counterpart of constitution, distinguishes the connotation and procedure used by the property law and the constitution, and proves the independence of the takings clause of property law in the legal system. Centering on the difference between takings clause of the property law and similar institutions, this paper provides a comparative analysis of taking practice in Germany, France and the United States, and proposes the prerequisite problem ＂the interference to what extent constitutes a taking＂. Finally, in view of the recent heated debate about restrictions imposed upon automobiles, this paper classifies the problem theorotically,and clarifies some fuzzy premises.

关 键 词：征收 物权法 宪法 物权限制 机动车限行 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学] F812.8[政治法律—法学]