检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余为青[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2009年第8期86-90,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:"当场击毙"既可以指警察使用致命武力的行为,也可以指警察使用武力导致的死亡后果。"当场击毙"涉及到公民生命权的切实保护。我国"当场击毙"在立法方面存在着法律属性不明,规范层次太低和程序法规范不足等问题,在实践中也存在滥用现象,特别是受害方很难通过司法手段保护自己的权利。"当场击毙"行为在实体法上可以界定为正当防卫、紧急避险或者是执行上级命令的行为,把"当场击毙"的立法规范上升为法律层次,规定使用武力应当遵循"合理必需"的标准,对适用情形应严加限制;对使用过程实行程序控制,特别是应规定因实施"当场击毙"行为而产生的纠纷可以进行司法审查和救济。"Shooting someone dead on sight" refers to the act that policemen use deadly force or the death caused by policemen' s use of force. It is connected with citizen' s life protection. In China, the legislation of "shooting someone dead on sight" is not defined clearly, of low level and lack of procedural law. It is abused in practice, esp when victims are unable to protect their own tights through judicial channel. In the substantive law, it may be defined as the act of legal defence, necessity or execution of superior orders. Its laws and regulations should be of legal standards, requiring that use of force should conform to the standard of " reasonable necessary", restricting its application situations, and controlling its procedure of use, especially prescribing that issues came from the enforcement of " shooting someone dead on sight" should be reviewed and remedied judicially.
分 类 号:DF34[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15