错误合同撤销权行使之探讨  

Execution of the Right of Revocation of Fault Contracts

作　　者：余艳清[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建金融职业技术学院人文法律系,福州350007

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期53-56,共4页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要："意思表示错误"或简称"错误"是意思表示瑕疵的一种,我国民事立法上只规定了重大误解制度,并没有意思表示错误制度的规定,且理论上对错误的研究还很薄弱,民事立法上的欠缺已经对现实生活造成了一定的障碍。因意思表示错误而订立的合同为错误合同。错误合同应属于可撤销的合同,撤销权应由主观上无重大过失的有瑕疵意思的当事人在发现错误后即时以明示的方式行使。错误合同撤销后,其效力原则上应溯及合同成立时无效,但在一些存在长期履行的合同关系中,行为人不得行使溯及既往的撤销权,而只能行使一项限于对未来产生效力的终止权。＂The meaning indicates error＂ or the abbreviated ＂error＂ means flaw. The Civil Legislation of China only defines great misunderstanding system but it doesn＇t have the stipulation of the meaning indicating error. Moreover, the research on error is not enough in theory. The deficiency in the Civil Legislation has caused great hindrance to the real life. Contracts which are signed on the basis of the meaning indicating error are fault contracts, which are revocable. The rights of revocation should be performed by the person concerned who has no great mistakes by expression when discovering errors. After the fault contracts are revoked, their force in principle that should date from the engagement of the contract is invalid. Performers mustn＇t exert former rights of revocation while they can exert rights of termination which have force to the future.

关 键 词：错误合同 撤销权 合同效力 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]