检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《石河子大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第3期341-344,共4页Journal of Shihezi University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(50874064);山东省自然科学基金重点项目(Z2007F10)
摘 要:基于滑面正应力假定,可以很方便地得到给定滑动面的安全系数,但不同的滑面正应力假定对结果的影响值得研究。本文通过随机模拟方法,给出了不同滑面正应力假定下安全系数的分布,并对给定的多个滑动面,经计算比较了该方法与不平衡推力法的误差大小。分析结果表明:给定滑动面愈接近临界滑动面,其结果误差愈小;对任意给定的滑动面,误差可高达900%以上。The factor of safety for given slip surface can be obtained easily by assuming the normal stress along the slip surface base and solving the statistic equilibrium equations for the whole sliding body. This method is characterized by no iteration and easy convergence. However, the effect of different assumptions of normal stress on the results of given slip surface has not been reported. The stochastic method is used in this paper to generate different assumptions of normal stress along the slip surface base, and the results related to different assumptions can be calculated. It can be summarized that the nearer to the critical slip surface, the smaller the difference. For some slip surfaces, the difference can be up to 900%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.187.205