贵州乡村旅游开发天龙模式和郎德模式的比较  

Comparison between Tianlong and Grande Mode of Rural Tourism Development in Guizhou

作　　者：陈志永[1] 周杰[1] 况志国 

机构地区：[1]贵州师范学院区域旅游研究所,贵州贵阳550018 [2]贵州雷山县计划生育局,贵州雷山557100

出　　处：《贵州农业科学》2009年第6期250-255,共6页Guizhou Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"少数民族村寨社区参与旅游发展研究"(07CMZ014);贵州省教育厅高等学校人文社会科学项目"贵州乡村旅游发展典型模式剖析与比较研究"(0705177)

摘　　要：天龙屯堡和郎德苗寨同属贵州省著名乡村旅游目的地,因不同利益主体在旅游开发中发挥作用的差异,形成了多个利益主体共同参与,旅游公司主导的天龙模式和社区主导的郎德模式。二者在乡村旅游开发与传统文化保护、传承方面作了许多有益探索,且各具特色,颇具典型性。对2种不同旅游开发模式下文化保护与传承情况进行对比研究,有助于为我国乡村旅游持续发展提供经验借鉴和理论指导,并推动我国乡村旅游开发研究不断向前发展。Tianlong Tunbao and Grande Miao Village both are famous village tourism destinations in Guizhou province and there are two different management modes such as Tianlong mode and Grande mode. The Tianlong mode is dominated by travel agencies and Grande mode is dominated by the local community. Two modes with their own characteristic have made valuable contributions for traditional cultural protection and heritage in rural tourism development. The paper puts forward the experience and theoretical guidance for sustainable development of China＇s rural tourism by comparing different characteristics in cultural protection and heritage under two different tourism development modes to further promote China＇ s rural tourism development.

关 键 词：乡村旅游 天龙模式 郎德模式 贵州 

分 类 号：F326.5[经济管理—产业经济]