两种手背浅静脉穿刺方法结果比较分析  

Comparison of two different kinds of intravenous puncture on back of hand.

作　　者：叶晓群[1] 卢华[1] 包丽君[1] 梁海燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省遂宁市船山区妇幼保健院,629000

出　　处：《护理实践与研究》2009年第13期3-4,19,共3页Nursing Practice and Research

摘　　要：目的:减轻手背浅静脉穿刺时对组织血管的损伤及产妇的疼痛,提高静脉穿刺成功率。方法:将500例住院产妇随机分为两组,对照组采用常规法,实验组采用压痕直刺针尖斜面向左倾斜45°法进行穿刺。两组选用的静脉、药物相同,环境温度相同。结果:实验组方法对组织血管损伤小,产妇疼痛反应轻,液体外渗少,首次穿刺成功率高,经统计学处理,两组具有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论:实验组方法能减轻静脉穿刺过程中的疼痛、减少对组织血管的损伤、提高首次穿刺成功率,可在妇产科临床护理中推广应用。Objective：To explore the best intravenous puncture method to bring less vessels injuries or make less pain to the patients ,and improve the success rate of intravenous puncture. Metheds：Total 500 hospitalized puerperas were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. The control group were punctured with the general method ,while the experimental group with the method which puncture with the ram of necdle point towards the left 45 degrees. Two groups select the vein, the same medicine,the same ambient temperature. Results：The experimental group got less vessels injury or reaction of pain.,Liquid leakage of the experimental group was less than the comparison group group. The rate of puncturing successfully in one time was higher than the control group. There was evidently statistical difference between two groups （ P 〈 0.01 ）. Conclusion： The method of puncturing with the ram of needle point towards the left 45 degrees can bring less vessels injuries or make less pain to the patients ,and improve the success rate of puncturing succossfully in one time. So we should generalize it in gynecologic nursing care.

关 键 词：手背静脉 静脉穿刺 疼痛 液体外渗 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]