检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建鹃[1] 洪伟[1] 林晗[1] 吴承祯[1] 杨细明[1] 李键[1] 范海兰[1] 陈灿[1]
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学森林生态研究所,福建省高校森林生态系统过程与经营重点实验室,福建福州350002
出 处:《西南林学院学报》2009年第3期26-30,共5页Journal of Southwest Forestry College
基 金:教育部博士点学科专项基金资助(20050389001);福建省科技厅重点专项资助(2006NZ0001A)
摘 要:用主成分分析和投影寻踪法对野生雷公藤进行优良单株生长性状选择标准的探讨,结果表明:2种方法均可应用于雷公藤优良单株的选择,其中主成分分析法主要选择指标为盖度、主藤长和地径,而投影寻踪法主要选择指标为主藤长、地径和盖度。对比2种选优方法优缺点,确定主藤长和地径为野生雷公藤优树选择的指标;根据综合评价,共选出20个优良单株,并发现2种方法所选出的优良单株完全一致。The selection standards for growth traits of superior individual trees of Tripterygium wilfordii were studied by means of the methods of Principal Component Analysis and Projection Pursuit respectively. The results showed that both of these two methods were applicable for the superior individual tree selection of T. wilfordii. The method of Principal Component Analysis was more appropriate to be adopted by taking coverage, length and the basal diameter of the main rattans as the main selection indices, while the method of Projection Pursuit was more suitable to be applied by taking the length of main rattans, the basal diameter and the coverage as the main selection indices. The length of the main rattans and the basal diameter were determined as the main selection indices for superior trees on wild T. wilfordii by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. 20 superior individual trees were selected based on the comprehensive evaluation, and it was found out that the superior individual trees selected by the two different selection methods were exactly the same.
分 类 号:S722.33[农业科学—林木遗传育种]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249