民族志的“真实性”  

"Reality" of Ethnography

作　　者：彭兆荣[1] 谭红春[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学人类学研究所 [2]厦门大学体育教学部 [3]厦门大学人类学系,博士研究生厦门361005

出　　处：《广西民族研究》2009年第2期71-77,共7页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES

摘　　要："真实性"历来被视为民族志研究的一个核心问题。在当代"反思"原则的作用下,人类学展开了对传统民族志以"科学性"和"客观性"为原则的反思和批评,探讨人类学是否科学,是否承认民族志在写作过程中人类学家的"主观性"和"解释性"。针对民族志的"真实性"问题,本文集中从历史记忆、民族志范式、民族志修辞、民间戏剧、舞台表演、影视作品、仪式等方面对"真实性"问题进行研讨。＂Reality＂ has always been a core issue of ethnographic studies, under the contemporary principle of ＂reflection＂, in terms of Anthropology, suspicion and criticism were carried out on the basic rules of traditional ethnography ——＂scientific＂ and ＂objective＂, discuss whether Anthropology is scientific or not, whether Anthropologists＇ ＂subjectivity＂ and ＂interpretation＂ can be accepted or not. Regarding to ＂Reality＂ of Ethnography, this paper focused on ＂reality ＂ of historic memory, ethnography style, ethnography rhetoric, folk drama, stage performance, TV and film, ritual.

关 键 词：民族志 真实性 民族志范式 多样性 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]