刑事裁判文书说理性的应然思考与路径选择  

Rational Thinking and Choose Routing on Reason of Criminal Justice Instruments

作　　者：沈玉忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2009年第3期102-107,共6页Journal of Sichuan Police College

摘　　要：刑事裁判文书质量是体现法官司法能力的重要标杆。当下,刑事裁判文书说理的缺失严重影响着刑事裁判文书的质量,严重地制约法院审判功能的发挥。努力提高刑事裁判文书说理性,有助于实现法律效果与社会效果的统一,有助于提高司法裁判社会认同度与公信力,也将对我国刑事判例制度的建构大有裨益。为了提高刑事裁判文书说理性,应进行裁判文书工作规范化建设。Criminal justice instruments is am important post reflected the quality of the judge＇s judicial capacity. Now, the lack of reasoning on the criminal jurisdiction instruments seriously affected the quality of the criminal jurisdiction instrument, and severely restricted the trial court＇s function to play. Strive to improve reasoning on the criminal jurisdiction instrument helps achieve reunification of the effect of the law and so- cial effects, and help to improve the administration of justice, social acceptance and credibility of the criminal case, and it is great benefit to build the system of criminal case in China. In order to improve reasoning of the criminal justice instruments, we should standardized judicial paperwork.

关 键 词：刑事裁判 裁判理由 应然思考 路径选择 

分 类 号：D926.13[政治法律—法学] G212.2[文化科学—新闻学]