检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南大学发展研究院,云南昆明650091 [2]西藏银监局,西藏拉萨850000
出 处:《西藏研究》2009年第3期94-103,共10页Tibetan Studies
摘 要:西藏作为一个经济欠发达省区,长期以来,其经济发展始终未能摆脱政府主导和资源主导型模式,呈现出落后地区的典型经济特征。无论是普雷维什依据世界经济体系的构成背景提出的"中心—外围"理论或是其追随者提倡的对国内储蓄与外资吸收的合理配置,还是法国经济学家弗郎索瓦.佩鲁提出的"增长极"理论,在西藏经济发展的运用中,都遇到了特殊的困难。文章基于1991年孙勇先生所提出的"非典型性二元经济结构"视角,从西藏产业结构演化、比较优势特征、资本市场现状及金融外生性特质等方面,探讨目前实现西藏经济跨越式发展的可行方式。As an economically underdeveloped autonomous region,Tibet's economic development has not been able to shake off the government-induced and resource-based model,showing a typical backward -economic characteristic for a long period. No matter it is The "core and periphery" theory which based on the background of world economic system founded by Raúl Prebisch,or the absorption of domestic savings and the rational allocation of capital advocated by Raúl Prebisch's followers,or the"growth pole" theory advocated by French economist Francois Perroux,all encountered special difficulties when used in Tibet. In this paper,based on the theory of"atypical dual economic structure"founded by professor Sun Yong in 1991,the author prospects the evolution of Tibet's industrial structure,the characteristics of comparative advantages,the exogenous characteristic of capital market and financial status,to explore the possible way of Tibet's economic development by leaps and bounds.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229