检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:温建清[1] 周红烨[1] 张玉萍[1] 龚小春[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2009年第7期11-13,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的比较气管内持续微泵推注湿化法与气管内间断滴药湿化法对患者的影响。方法采用随机分组法,观察组25例气管切开患者应用持续微泵推注湿化法湿化气道;对照组24例用气管内间断滴药湿化法湿化气道,2组进行回顾性对照研究。结果观察组患者的血氧饱和度较对照组明显增加,痰痂形成、刺激性咳嗽、气道出血、肺部感染较对照组明显降低,两者比较,差异明显。结论持续性气管内滴药法的效果优于传统的间断气管内滴药法,且可明显节省气道湿化的护理工作量。Objective To compare the influence of the continuous airway humidification with micropump and the discontinuous dripping technique on patients. Methods Randomized grouping method was adopted, 25 cases with tracheotomy in the observation group used continuous airway humidification with micropump, 24 cases in the control group used dripping technique via airway for airway humidification. The two groups were compared retrospectively. Results The oxygen saturation rate in the observation group increased compared with that of the control group, sputum callus formation, irritating cough, airway bleeding and pulmonary infection was significantly lower than those of the control group. Conclusions The effect of continuons airway humidification with micropump is superior to the traditional method of inconsistent endotracheal dripping, the former can also decrease nursing workload of airway humidification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13