检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈淑英[1] 魏艳[1] 赵梅[1] 高慧莲[1] 王凤云[1]
出 处:《印染助剂》2009年第7期50-52,共3页Textile Auxiliaries
摘 要:采用三种方法[EDTA滴定法(用磺基水杨酸显色)、Fe3+滴定法(用磺基水杨酸显色)和碘量法]测定螯合剂TF-510、TF-133A、TF-133B的螯合能力,并比较其测定结果.结果表明:3种测定方法各有优缺点,其中,Fe3+滴定法(用磺基水杨酸显色)相对标准偏差最小,操作简单、方便且不受放置时间、样品本身颜色的影响,故测定螯合剂螯合能力时选择此法为宜。Three methods [EDTA titration method (develop using sulfosalicylic acid), Fe^3+ titration method (develop using sulfosalicylic acid) and iodimetric method] were used to determine Fe (m) ion chelating power of chelating agents TF-510, TF-133A and TF-133B. And the measurement results were compared. The results indicated that three methods have their advantage and weakness, Fe^3+ titration method (develop using sulfosalicylic acid) has minimum relative standard deviation, and this method was simple, convenient and it has nothing to do with storage time and sample color. Consequently, this method is the best to determine the chelating power of chelating agent,better precision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.239.228