论戴维森与达米特关于意义与真的辩护  

On the Defense of Significance and True between Davidson and Dummett

作　　者：谢佛荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学泰州学院,江苏泰州225300

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期74-78,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：论述了戴维森和达米特针对对方和其他学者的批评是如何做出回应的,指出不论是达米特的反实在论理论,还是戴维森的成真条件语义学,本身都有一定的不足和缺陷。通过对两者关于意义与真的辩护的分析,得出结论:西方现代哲学对形而上学问题的探讨和研究,无论是从研究的问题上,还是从研究的方式上,与传统哲学相比已具有完全不同的特征。An explanation focuses on how Davidson and Dummett react to the criticism of each other and other scholars. It is drawn up from the above analysis and explanation that there are deficiencies and shortages in both Dummett＇ s theory of anti - realism and Davidson＇ s semantics of real conditions. Then an important conclusion has been obtained from the analysis on the defense of significance and true between them, which is that the study and discussion of western modem philosophy on the metaphysics have quite different characteristics whether from the problem of study or the way of research, compared with the traditional philosophy.

关 键 词：三角测量模式 成真条件语义学 二值原则 反实在论 

分 类 号：B812.22[哲学宗教—逻辑学]