检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李变[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院国家授时中心,西安710600 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100039
出 处:《时间频率学报》2009年第1期56-62,共7页Journal of Time and Frequency
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(60272067);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向资助项目(KJCX2-SW-T07)
摘 要:为了更好地计算GPSCV(共视)时间传递中的电离层时延值(它是影响GPSCV比对结果精度的主要因素之一),介绍了当前3种电离层时延的计算方法,并以NICT(National Institute of Information and Communications Technology)单站GPS比对数据及NICT与NTSC(National Time Service Center)的GPS共视比对数据为例,分析比较了不同的电离层时延计算方法对GPS时间比对结果精度的影响。计算结果表明:利用双频实测电离层时延和利用IGS(International GPS Service)提供的TEC(total electron content)map计算的电离层时延对GPSCV比对结果修正后的精度,比利用电离层改正模型的时延对比对结果修正后的精度分别提高30%~40%和20%~30%。For more accurately calculating the ionospheric delay in GPS CV (common view) time transfer, which is one of the main factors to affect GPS CV time comparison precision, three different methods of calculating the ionospheric delay are introduced and the different effects of the different calculating methods on the precision of GPS CV comparison are compared and analyzed with the GPS comparison data of NICT(National Institute of Information and Communications Technology) and GPS CV comparison data of NICT-NTSC(National Time Service Center) as some examples. The results show that the precision of GPS CV time transfer in which the ionospheric delay is corrected by using the double-frequency measure and the precision of GPS CV time transfer in which the ionospheric delay is corrected by using the TEC map issued by IGS (International GPS Service) are raised by 30%-40% and 20% -30% respectively compared with the precision of GPS CV time transfer in which the ionospheric delay is corrected by using the ionospheric correction model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63