检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]邢台职业技术学院服装系,河北邢台054035
出 处:《上海纺织科技》2009年第7期23-25,共3页Shanghai Textile Science & Technology
摘 要:从原型法、比例法的概念入手,对两种方法的构成原理进行对比分析,提出了单一掌握原型法或比例法不能满足现代服装企业"个性化、短周期、小批量"的运营需求。认为将两种方法优势互补、灵活应用才能适应服装行业合理、高效的设计要求。服装样板师要精通原型法与比例法的结构设计原理,掌握其区别与共性,能够根据不同的订单巧妙运用这两种方法,使其发挥最大的效应,降低成本,提高效率。According to the concept of Prototype method and Proportion method, the principles of the two methods are compared. It concludes that the single use of Prototype method or Proportion method can not meet the .running need of "individuation, short - period and small- batch" required by clothing enterprises. It advocates that the fashion industry should complement the two methods, utilize their essentials and apply them flexibly in order to adapt the rational and efficient design development of the apparel industry. Pattern - makers should be proficient in the structure design principles of the two methods and master their differences and the similarities and apply them flexibly in different onters to maximize their effects, reduce costs and improve efficiency.
分 类 号:TS941.2[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222