检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2009年第14期1257-1258,共2页Journal of Nurses Training
摘 要:目的探讨两种术前肠道准备方法对提高妇科患者舒适度的效果观察。方法采用传统对照的方法,选择200例妇科手术患者,2007年1~12月的100例为对照组,采用传统肠道准备方法,2008年1~12月的100例为观察组,采用新的肠道准备方法。观察两种肠道准备方法的灌肠次数和患者出现不适的人数。结果与传统肠道准备方法相比,新肠道准备方法的灌肠次数和引起患者不适感的人数都明显降低,差异具有显著意义P=0.0000)。结论新肠道准备方法优于传统肠道准备方法,具有一定的临床价值。Objective To study the effects of two kinds of pre-operative preparations of intestinal tract for improving the degree of comfort for patients in gynecology department. Method 200 patients were selected for this study, 100 hospitalized patients in control group for gynecological surgery from January to December in 2007 were given traditional preoperative preparation, and 100 hospitalized patients in observation group from January to December in 2008 were given new preoperative preparation. The observed indexes were the number of times of cleansing enema and the number of patients who felt discomfort during cleansing enema. Result Compared with the control group given traditional preoperative preparation, the number of times and patients with discomfort during cleansing enema were significantly decreased in observation group given new preoperative preparation (P= 0. 0000). Conclusion The new preoperative preparation was superior to the traditional one and it's worth some clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145