检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市荣昌县人民检察院,重庆402460 [2]西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆400031
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2009年第4期58-62,共5页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:在检察机关自侦的贪污贿赂案件证据体系中,言词证据因具有证实犯罪事实的直接性而具有重要价值。犯罪嫌疑人、被告人翻供,证人改变证词等问题已直接影响到自侦案件的质量。这既有言词证据特点方面的原因,也有贪污贿赂案件特点方面的原因,更有侦查人员收集、固定证据态度方面的原因。应当通过端正侦查人员对待言词证据的态度、采用科学的询问(讯问)方法和先进的科学技术并在庭审中贯彻直接言词原则来解决以上问题。In the system of the prosecution evidence of corruption and bribery eases, the verbal evidence has great value in the direct proof of the crime. With the more forms of struggle against corruption and the proceedings continue to open, the changing of statements in trial has a great relate to the quality of the case. These problems resulted from many reasons including the nature of verbal evidence, the characteristics of corruption and bribery cases, and the attitude of investigators in collecting and fixing the verbal evidence. Several measures should be taken to solve the problem including correcting the attitude of investigators towards the verbal evidence, obtaining verbal evidence by technical investigation, and carrying out the principle of directness and verbal trial in the court.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.192.51