反坦克弹药对装甲毁伤能力的比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of the Destroy Effectiveness to Tank Armor Caused by Anti-tank Ammunition

作　　者：吴晓颖[1] 吴东亚[1] 张万君 

机构地区：[1]装甲兵工程学院兵器工程系．北京100072

出　　处：《科技导报》2009年第13期60-63,共4页Science & Technology Review

摘　　要：随着坦克装甲厚度的不断增加和各种主、被动反应装甲的广泛应用,现代坦克的防护能力得到极大提高。与此同时,反坦克弹药也在不断发展变化,种类不断增加,性能不断提高。为了对坦克目标实现最大的打击,利用理论计算、简单建模和实验数据搜集等方法,对主要反坦克弹药——穿甲弹、破甲弹和榴弹对坦克的毁伤进行了对比分析。通过首发命中率、射击密集度等主要指标和坦克目标装甲毁伤程度的对比,得出在坦克上应增加穿甲弹和榴弹,减少破甲弹的结论,为坦克弹药的优化奠定了基础,同时为装甲装备的数字化创造了条件。As the tank armor＇ thickness is gradually increasing and various active and passive reactive armors are widely used, modern tanks＇ protection ability has greatly improved. Meanwhile, anti-tank ammunitions are developing and changing as well, species increasing and performance improving. In order to make the strongest strike to the tanks, the essay conducts a comparative analysis among the damages caused by main anti-tank ammunitions, which are armor piercing projectile, shaped charge projectile and grenade, via methods such as theoretical calculation, modeling and experimental data collections. Comparing the key indicators, probability of a first round hit and firing intensity, and contrasting the changes of tank armor, the study concluded that more armor piercing projectiles and grenades, and less shaped charge projectiles should be placed in tanks. This not only lays the foundation for the optimization of the ammunition, but also creates conditions for the armored equipment digitized.

关 键 词：穿甲弹 破甲弹 榴弹 毁伤 

分 类 号：TJ410[兵器科学与技术—火炮、自动武器与弹药工程]