《文选》刘孝标徐悱作品之作时辨——《关于〈文选〉中六篇作品的写作年代》异议及其他  

On the Completed Year of the Works by Liu Xiaobiao and Xu Fei in Wenxuan

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第3期6-11,共6页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：广西"人文强桂"建设工程项目"<文选>研究"(桂科软05111001)

摘　　要：刘孝标《辨命论》作于"天监初至七年以前"与"天监八年或稍后"两说,分别因漏"初"与误解"经年"所致,是论作于天监十五年或略后;《广绝交论》作于"天监七年"说,缘误解"坟未宿草"与忽略"诸孤"必服阕后方能远出之背景,是论当作于天监九年冬或天监十年冬;《重答刘秣陵沼书》作于天监十六至十八年之间。徐悱《古意酬到长史溉登琅邪城诗》当作于天监十八年或其后的普通一、二年,甚至更晚,且以入普通以后作的可能性为大。There are two conclusions for the written year of on destiny by Liu Xiaobiao,one proves it was completed before the 1^st and the other 7^th year in Tianjian--the reign title of Liang Wudi; but the two ideas are both wrong： the former give the idea by missing a word ＂at the outset＂ while the latter misunderstanding the idiom ＂years passing＂. Then we hold the idea that the discussion was completed on 15^th year in Tianjian or a little later. The wrong conclusion that on break off relations was completed on 7^th year in Tianjian is resulted by mistaking the idiom ＂no grass around the new tomb＂ and neglecting the background only when the sons are out of mourning can they go for long journey--that this discussion was completed on the winter of 9th or 10th year in Tianjian. A second letter in reply again to Liu zha was completed between the 16^th and 18^th year in Tianjian. Xu Fei＇s to dao gai an antiquities for ascending on the langya castle should be completed on the 18^th year in Tianjian or 1^st or 2^nd year in Putong,and it is more possibly written in the year of Putong.

关 键 词：文选 刘孝标 徐悱 写作时间 异议 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]