SF-36量表第二版应用于重庆市区居民生命质量研究的信效度检验  

Evaluation on reliability and validity of SF-36 Scale (Version 2) in urban residents' quality of life in Chongqing

作　　者：李鹃[1] 王宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学妇幼与儿童少年卫生学教研室,重庆400016

出　　处：《第四军医大学学报》2009年第14期1342-1344,共3页Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University

基　　金：卫生部科学研究基金(WKJ2006-2-016)

摘　　要：目的:评价SF-36量表第二版应用于重庆市区居民生命质量研究的信度和效度,探讨其应用于重庆市区居民生命质量研究的可行性.方法:采用多阶段分层随机抽样的方法,用SF-36健康调查量表第二版、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)对738位居民进行自评量表式调查.通过复测信度、内部一致性信度,结构效度、效标关联效度等指标来评定SF-36量表第二版的信度和效度.结果:该量表具有良好的内部一致性,整个量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.8041;复测相关系数为0.763.因子分析产生的8个公因子与理论结构基本一致,结构效度的累计方差贡献为62.2%;与效标WHOQOL-BREF量表的相关系数为0.424.结论:SF-36健康调查量表第二版适合重庆市区居民生命质量测评.AIM： To evaluate the reliability, validity and feasi- bility of the Version 2 of SF-36 Scale in urban residents＇ quality of life in Chongqing. METHODS： Through multistage stratified sampling, the quality of life in 738 urban residents in Chongqing was assessed with SF-36 （ Version 2 ） and WHOQOL-BREF. The repetitive reliability, internal consistency, criterion-related validity and construct validity of the scale were tested. RESULTS： The internal constancy was good and Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0.8041. The test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.763. The factor analysis showed that the eight factors were all similar to the theory construction and the total variance contribution of construct validity was 62.2%. SF-36 was related with WHOQOL-BREF and correlation coefficient was 0.424. CONCLUSION： Version 2 of the SF-36 Scale is good for the measurement and assessment of quality of life of urban residents in Chongqing.

关 键 词：生活质量 SF-36量表(第二版) 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R195.4[医药卫生—卫生统计学]