检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴要武[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院人口与劳动经济研究所,邮政编码100852
出 处:《经济研究》2009年第7期91-106,共16页Economic Research Journal
基 金:中国社会科学院重点课题"中国城镇非正规就业问题"的部分成果
摘 要:中国政府把劳动力市场的正规化当作近年来的政策目标,本文从两个层面评估了这个目标是否正确:非正规就业者是否需要走向正规化?如何走向正规化?从微观层面上看,非正规就业者的教育收益率不低于正规就业者,劳动力市场灵活性高是有效率的;从城市层面看,随着发展水平的提高,劳动力市场的非正规化会自动下降。这两个结果意味着,促进劳动力市场正规化未必是一个恰当的政策目标,政府需要设法促进经济可持续增长,但不必强迫劳资双方签合同。In recent years, Chinese government has been focusing its labor market policy on formalizing the market. This paper evaluates the appropriateness of the focus by addressing two questions : should informally employed work force be converted into being formally employed? How should the government regulate the formalization process? On the one hand, retm'n on education to an employee in informal labor market, which is flexible and efficient, is not lower than that in formal labor market. On the other hand, with a city's economic development, the significance of informal labor market tends to decrease accordingly. These facts suggest that formalizing labor market should not be the focus of the government's labor market policy and that the government should dedicate itself to sustaining its economic development, instead of forcing employers and employees to sign formal contracts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120