检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京市血液中心,100088
出 处:《军医进修学院学报》2009年第4期498-499,共2页Academic Journal of Pla Postgraduate Medical School
摘 要:目的探讨不同检测方法、试剂对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体检测结果的影响。方法以不同试剂采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)对献血者血浆标本进行抗-HCV检测,呈反应性标本采用HCV RNA RT-PCR荧光定量确证检测。结果ELISA再次检测抗HCV抗体阳性率明显低于初次检测阳性率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),确证试验阳性率低于初次检测和再次检测的阳性率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论ELISA测定结果为HCV抗体阳性者应经HCV RNA RT-PCR荧光定量加以确认。Objective To investigate the impact of different methods and reagents on detection of anti-HCV antibody in blood donors. Methods Anti-HCV antibody in blood donors was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using different reagents, and positive sera were examined by Western blotting confirmatory test. Results Western blotting confirmatory test showed a lower positive anti-HCV rate than ELISA (P〈0.05). Conclusion Positive HCV antibody detected by ELISA should be confirmed by quantifying fluorescence in HCV RNA RT-PCR.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145