检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈锐[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2009年第4期36-42,共7页Legal Forum
基 金:重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目"法律实证主义研究"(2008-NFX04)的阶段性成果
摘 要:一般人们认为,法律不是真理,法律与真理是分离的。但从历史的维度看,法律与真理分离的时间非常短暂。20世纪中叶之后,随着"事实与价值分离"观念的倒塌,"法律真理"这一观念不证自明起来。但何谓法律真理?是"符合论"意义上的,还是诠释学意义上的?由于"符合论"法律真理理论遇到了诸多难题,导致了法律真理的异化,因此,法律真理应是诠释学意义上的真理。法律真理是人的存在状态,是人展现自我、规划自我的一种方式,是人为实现自身本质而进行的一种制度安排。理解法律真理的路径在于法律实践。In general, people think that law is not truth and they are separate. But if we see them from the point of view of history, we find that the separate time is very short. The separationsprings from the idea that the fact and the value are separate, which is very popular from 19 century to the beginning of 20 century. But after the middle period of 20 century, with the separation idea breaking down, legal truth has been established. But what is legal truth? Which is more appropriate between correspondence theory of truth and hermeneutics truth theory? Since correspondence theory of truth has met with a lot of problems, and led catabolism of legal math, we ought to understand legal truth from hermeneutics, legal truth is a state which human being survive, and a mode which human being exhibit and project for themselves, and a constitutional arrangement which human being devise for achieving the nature of human being. The path of comprehending legal truth rests with legal practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.162.48