论侵犯商业秘密案件审判中的几个问题  

On Several Questions of Trying Infringement of the Business Secret

作　　者：韩中节[1] 

机构地区：[1]东莞理工学院政法系,广东东莞523808

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第9期105-109,共5页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：张玉敏教授主持的国家社科基金<新中国民法典起草五十年回顾与展望>(05XFX015)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：我国《反不正当竞争法》将侵害商业秘密的主体限定为"经营者",显然不敷使用,有必要进行扩张解释;关于商业秘密侵权行为种类的规定过于简单,使得实践当中的许多侵权行为成为漏网之鱼;保密义务有别于竞业禁止义务;侵害商业秘密案件不适用"谁主张,谁举证"原则;侵害商业秘密案件原则上应当设立诉讼禁令制度;关于商业秘密侵权的民事责任应当进一步完善。In this article, the author discusses some shortcomings of the Antl-competition law of PRC, and then puts forward some improvements. These are： it is too narrow for Anti-competition Law of PRC to define the infringer of the business secret as ＂the operator of the business （or the manager） ＂, and therefore, it should be enlarged; it is too simple to stipulate the infringement activities of the business secret, and to make some of the infringements of the business secret can not be punished ; it is necessary to classify the differences between the obligation of the keeping secret and the obligation of the anti-competition ; the ＂who claim, who burden the evidence＂ principle is not applied in the case of the infringement of the business secret; the remedy of the injunction should be used in the case of the infringement of the business secret; and the civil obligations which the infringer of the business secret should be perfected.

关 键 词：商业秘密侵权行为 保密义务 诉讼禁令 举证责任 损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学] G212[文化科学—新闻学]